Spiel checking
I am always entertained when I find the consequence of spell checking without
corresponding proofreading in books or in the newspaper. Today's online
version of a Times Op-Ed piece was a pretty funny example:
For some years now, the Energy Department has been hoping to separate its wastes into two streams, reserving deep burial for only the part with high radioactivity. In the case of the South Carolina site, the department is prepared to pump most of the waste out of the tanks for disposal through deep burial. But it wants to leave a hard-to-remove residue of sludge in the tanks and bury it under grout.Maybe it's just me but I find it hard to imagine that grout is the ideal encasement material for high level nuclear waste...
04:57 AM, 03 Jun 2004 by Jeff Davis Permalink | Comments (2)
Archive
| June 2004 | ||||||
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
March 2005
February 2005
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
July 2003
June 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
